You are on CGS' Legacy Site.

    Thank you for visiting CGS! You are currently using CGS' legacy site, which is no longer supported. For up-to-date information, including publications purchasing and meeting information, please visit cgsnet.org.

    Summary of Findings
    II. Summary of Findings

     

    1. Gross Cost Saving

     

    Under the assumptions detailed below the maximum University budget impact resulting from the elimination of the Graduate School and distributing the administrative functions to other units total is a $245,628 gross reduction in University budget.

     

    2. Net Cost Impact

     

    To arrive at the net impact on University budget we must adjust the gross reduction by the cost of assigning the functions currently performed by the Graduate School to other units. We estimate this cost shifting using four alternative methods detailed below. The results of the analyses are as follows:

     

    Method 1: Cost Allocation. The net impact on University budget is increased cost by $70,323.
      

    Method 2: Functions Analysis. The net impact on University budget is increased cost by $389,061.
      

    Method 3: Comparative Data. The net impact on University budget is increased cost by $260,034.
      

    Method 4: Extrapolation. The net impact on University budget is increased cost by $587,896.

     

    It should not be surprising that the cost of decentralized administration of graduate programs exceed the cost of a centralized office. A centralized office allows for economies of scale. It is because of this that the vast majority of universities in the U.S. do have centralized administration, and those that have decentralized administration have  graduate programs in each discipline large enough to realize the benefits of the economies of scale.  Some universities that moved from centralized to decentralized administrative structures reverted later to the centralized model according to the paper by Beere cited above.

     

    3. Other Costs

     

    In addition to these net financial costs there are non-monetary costs resulting from the reduction in the quality of service to the graduate students, and these should be considered in making decisions regarding the administrative structure. Centralization of the functions allows for division of labor and specialization among staff resulting in each member of the staff developing the knowledge and expertise that would not be possible if a part-time staff person in each department or college has to handle all of the different functions3.

     

    Furthermore, consistency in applying the standards and uniformity in the treatment of students are less likely with the multiplicity of administrative loci, as each unit’s interpretation of the standards and processes will likely be different from others. The lack of consistency and uniformity in applying the standards increase the likelihood of grievances and legal challenges to administrative decisions. Experience shows that adjudicating grievances and litigation can be costly to the university. While we do not have data at this time, it is possible to collect data on the frequency of adjudicating grievances per 1,000 graduate students in centralized and decentralized systems.

     

    < Introduction          Detailed Analyses >

     

    CGS is the leading source of information, data analysis, and trends in graduate education. Our benchmarking data help member institutions to assess performance in key areas, make informed decisions, and develop plans that are suited to their goals.
    CGS Best Practice initiatives address common challenges in graduate education by supporting institutional innovations and sharing effective practices with the graduate community. Our programs have provided millions of dollars of support for improvement and innovation projects at member institutions.
    As the national voice for graduate education, CGS serves as a resource on issues regarding graduate education, research, and scholarship. CGS collaborates with other national stakeholders to advance the graduate education community in the policy and advocacy arenas.  
    CGS is an authority on global trends in graduate education and a leader in the international graduate community. Our resources and meetings on global issues help members internationalize their campuses, develop sustainable collaborations, and prepare their students for a global future.